Thread:Lord-Vengion/@comment-25742780-20160512222452/@comment-25742780-20160730010510

" and further no one has ever compared the raegornians to the flood"

Your point being? My point was that the Raegorians can either be short lived and bent on conquest or higher-thinking and conquesting only to ensure sustinace or a rather shortlived political goal. Not both.

" alliance that history paints the raegornians as monsters who needed to be put down."

So now the ALLIANCE is going to be the villian? This fundamentally conflicts with your attempt to establish morals. To use the star wars analogy again, Luke is not a troubled social reject whom survives of criminal dealings, only lifted to greatness by mistake. The character that is the basis of the moral cannot be amoral.

" further in the overarching storyline it is important to note that in fact the raegorninans were in fact pupets to a very ancient and imortal game known as the war of the ockts few in alliance history"

This complication is fine but also incompatable with morals.

"   moreover if it ever did strike a raegornians fancy he very well coud as you put it "bang a sexy human" the are humanoid so they are perfectly capable of that it just wouldnt create offspring nor would it likely be consensual."

how could they do so if they were a different species? Humans and post-humans and Raegos are separated by millions of miles and hundreds of years- how on earth are they still compatable?

" they require but a teacher of the willing and a punisher of those who do not follow."

this would be true if it was a random occurance within humans or post-humans that took place over 40 or so years, but this is the ENTIRE species, and therefore it requires much more than just a nebulos "bad guy".

" fact comiting the greater crime standing by while others did terrible things."

Oh piffle. You are as subjected to the draft as any other american male and indead 1940s era german male and it is naive to think that one man can so suddenly change the immense tide of a country. Furthermore any attempt to bring morals into the second world war is quickly cut down by the motivations of the conflict- 1. money 2. juvinile attachments to ideas or patches of land. America is just as guilty as anybody else for these.

" would have changed the fundemntals of the previeous german society through programs like hitlers youth."

and then the assembly of countries would have a fairly boring rise and fall and would look extremely different in a mere half century. Perhaps the Nazi Reich would still be intact today but it would completely different; and personally I doubt this very much as if the soviet union can fall, so can anything else. It's just people in a country, nothing that special.

" but isolated and growing up and being taught to hate the other species of the galaxy  and that is very possible and once the war did start it only emphisesed their now normal to their species beliefs. as the political propaganda spewed by their government told them that they were the ones under attack so they must retaliate with overwhelming force. "

Okay so? then after a few years and a few wars the community forgets about that whole escapade and nothign special happens. Same species, same attitude, they don't become magical space nazis.

I don't understand why you claim that a few years and some propaganda create new species. North Koreans aren't species. Japan through it's isolation did not become a new species. Aboriginal aulstralians and the natives of america and hawaiians and marshall islanders and natives of madagascar and the saharan nomads are not their own seperate species. Political minsets are something that only last as long as the people who hold them. Raegons are of course long lived but they, like anyone, die. And like humans, they are lazy. A hundred years and the memories of hatred will be there, of course, but it will be distant, like that one kid who stole your bike in middle school.